|
|
| SOAP author says enough specs
already (7/03/03) |
SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA - A Microsoft Corp. engineer had harsh
words this week for vendors contributing to the plethora of Web
services specifications, and advised developers to read less of
them and get on with writing applications.
"Specs are like
bodily orifices: Everybody has them and they all have certain
unique characteristics. But just writing a spec means nothing.
If you write a spec that no one implements, did it ever really
specify anything?" Don Box, an architect in Microsoft's .Net
software group, asked developers at the XML Web Services One
conference here.
Box was one of the authors of the original
SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) specification in 1998. He
acknowledged having contributed to the "cacophony" of Web
services specifications and said he plans to write less.
A
"terrible, terrible thing" has happened in the past two years, he
told developers here. The software industry has become so fixated
on new specifications that it has lost sight of the fundamental
goal: using XML to link software applications together. While
some new specs that have been proposed are important and useful,
others are too complex and still others will probably never be
used, including some from Microsoft, he said.
XML (Extensible
Markup Language), a technology at the heart of Web services, is
by now "pretty stable," Box said, and "the Holy Trinity" of
Web services -- meaning SOAP, WSDL (Web Services Description
Language) and UDDI (Universal Description, Discovery and
Integration) -- are complete enough for most developers to
use.
Other specifications are being hammered out to address
security, management, orchestration and other aspects of Web
services, but he urged developers not to wait for the
results.
"I strongly encourage you not to wait for all of
this stuff to settle down. The important stuff has settled down
sufficiently that unless you are building the enterprise
information bus for your company, we are done. And if you're
building that (information bus), wait a few months and that
will settle down by the end of the year," he said.
His
four tips for developers: Read fewer specifications, write
more applications, write less code by using tools that generate
code automatically, and remember that humans matter, so if you
must write a specification, make it legible.
Anne Thomas
Manes, an analyst with The Burton Group Corp., agreed in
part. Service providers like Google Inc. and Kinko's Inc. have
already deployed Web services that allow customers to hook up to
their computer systems, she noted, while Merrill Lynch & Co.
Inc. is using Web services to link applications internally in
place of IBM Corp.'s MQ Series messaging software, she
said.
Upcoming specifications like WS-Security, being
hammered out by Microsoft, IBM and Verisign Inc., will be useful
for some, but in the meantime the existing SSL (Secure Sockets
Layer) security standard "solves 80 percent" of security needs
for Web services, she said.
Bob Sutor, IBM's director of Web
services technology, touched on the standards issue here earlier
in the day.
"This has got to be the year we stop talking
about SOAP and WSDL and start talking a lot more about what a
business can accomplish with Web services," he said.
Some
specifications have been proposed for competitive reasons as much
as because they solve any pressing need, Microsoft's Box
suggested. "What matters is software, not specs written by
vendors just to position yourself against five other vendors," he
said.
Box joined Microsoft early last year to help develop
its .Net Web services architecture and has a reputation as a
lively speaker. At the 2001 TechEd show in Barcelona he led a
discussion on SOAP while sitting in a bathtub.
On Monday, to
show that solidarity exists at least among developers, he coaxed
an IBM software engineer on stage and made him pose for a
picture while he kissed him on the cheek.
The XML Web
Services conference ends Thursday. Information is
at http://www.xmlconference.com/
|
| |
| Document accessed
118 | |
|